NELSON
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1968-06-10
No. 78
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968)., Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
392 U.S. 303 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 20 L. Ed. 2d 1109 · 88 S. Ct. 2062 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1364 · SCDB 1967-173
Cited by 12 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Nelson v. United States, 425 F.2d 188 (9th Cir. 1970)
    …Nelson’s conviction of bank robbery [Nelson v. United States, 375 F. 2d 739 (9th Cir. 1967)] and remanded the case for “further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476.” Nelson v. United States, 392 U.S. 303, 88 S.Ct. 2062, 20 L.Ed.2d 1109 (1968). Consistent with that direction this court referred the matter to the district court, which held a hearing and entered findings. The trial judge found that the confession of Wilder, Nelson’s co-defendant, was r…
  • Duncan v. Gen. Motors Corp., 499 F.2d 835 (10th Cir. 1974)
    …ns to that effect, allows a wife the right to sue for loss of consortium.3 Appellee contends the issue already has been decided in its favor by this court in Lunow v. Fairchance Lumber Co., 389 F. 2d 212 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. den’d, 392 U.S. 908, 88 S.Ct. 2062, 20 L.Ed.2d 1366; and Criqui v. Blaw-Knox Corp., 318 F. 2d 811 (10th Cir. 1963). In Lunow the wife, an Oklahoma resident, brought a loss of consortium action for injuries sustained by her husband, which injuries were compensable under the Oklahoma W…
  • Aero Mayflower Transit Co., Inc. v. United States, 409 U.S. 905 (U.S. 1972)
    …ugh docketed after expiration of the time prescribed in our Rules: Smith v. Mississippi, 373 U. S. 238; Arnold v. North Carolina, 376 U. S. 773; Mazzie v. United States, 375 U. S. 32; Robison v. United States, 390 U. S. 198; Nelson v. United States, 392 U. S. 303; Fuller v. Alaska, 393 U. S. 80; Banks v. California, 382 U. S. 420; Long v. Parker, 384 U. S. 32; Serio v. United States, 392 U. S. 305.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw