SERIO
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1968-06-10
No. 200
Mr. Justice Black dissents., Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968)., Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
392 U.S. 305 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 20 L. Ed. 2d 1111 · 88 S. Ct. 2063 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1366 · SCDB 1967-175
Cited by 5 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Black dissents.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …case. Williams v. Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 230 F. 2d 293 (5th Cir.1956) (Miss, law); Wheat v. Continental Casualty Co., 652 S.W. 2d 345 (Tenn.1983); Greenberg v. Aetna Ins. Co., 427 Pa. 511, 235 A. 2d 576 (Pa.1967), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 907, 88 S.Ct. 2063, 20 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1968). The district court, however, apparently admitted the evidence of non-prosecution to rebut the testimony of the fire officials. There are limited occasions when otherwise inadmissible testimony may be admitted as rebuttal. C…
  • …S. 773; Mazzie v. United States, 375 U. S. 32; Robison v. United States, 390 U. S. 198; Nelson v. United States, 392 U. S. 303; Fuller v. Alaska, 393 U. S. 80; Banks v. California, 382 U. S. 420; Long v. Parker, 384 U. S. 32; Serio v. United States, 392 U. S. 305.…
  • United States v. Headrick, 407 F.2d 384 (6th Cir. 1969)
    …defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of aiding and abetting in the passing of the money orders. Compare Serio v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 377 F. 2d 936, 938-939, vacated by the Supreme Court on grounds not involved on this appeal, 392 U.S. 305. See also Nye & Nissen v. United States, 336 U.S. 613, 619, 69 S.Ct. 766, 93 L.Ed. 919. Although appellant denied having been in Bowling Green, appellant testified affirmatively that he was with Smith at a time when other witnesses stated that Smit…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw