MCCARTY ET AL.
v.
KANSAS
MCCARTY ET AL.
KANSAS
392 U.S. 308
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted with respect to petitioner Boyd. The judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293. The petition for a writ of certiorari with respect to petitioner McCarty is denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (U.S. 1973)…, 55 Cal. Rptr. 62; People v. Dahlke, 257 Cal. App. 2d 82, 64 Cal. Rptr. 599; State v. Custer, 251 So. 2d 287 (Fla. App.); State v. Oldham, 92 Idaho 124, 438 P. 2d 275; State v. McCarty, 199 Kan. 116, 427 P. 2d 616, vacated in part on other grounds, 392 U. S. 308; Hohnke v. Commonwealth, 451 S. W. 2d 162 (Ky.); State v. Andrus, 250 La. 765, 199 So. 2d 867; Morgan v. State, 2 Md. App. 440, 234 A. 2d 762; State v. Witherspoon, 460 S. W. 2d 281 (Mo.); State v. Forney, 181 Neb. 757, 150 N. W. 2d 915; State v. Do…
Authorities Cited
- Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1968)