CHAN KWAN CHUNG
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

U.S. | 1968-06-17
No. 637
392 U.S. 642 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • City OF Chicago v. United States, 396 U.S. 162 (U.S. 1969)
    …at view are Vermont v. Boston & Maine Corp., 269 F. Supp. 80 (D. C. Vt.), and New York v. United States, 299 F. Supp. 989 (D. C. N. D. N. Y.). And see City of Williamsport v. United States, 273 F. Supp. 899, 282 F. Supp. 46 (D. C. M. D. Pa.), aff’d, 392 U. S. 642. “Without reciting individual cases the subcommittee is satisfied that State regulatory bodies all too often have been excessively conservative and unduly repressive in requiring the maintenance of uneconomic and unnecessary services and facilities…
  • Radrizzi v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & Chicago, 441 F.2d 1236 (8th Cir. 1971)
    …ecision by the Commission, itself has power to grant interim relief, not restricted to four months, pending the ultimate resolution of the investigation. For this they cite City of Williamsport v. United States, M.D.Pa., 1967, 273 F.Supp. 899, aff’d 392 U.S. 642, 88 S.Ct. 2286, 20 L.Ed.2d 1348. We have some question as to the relevance of that decision. It was there held that where the Commission had made an affirmative four-month order the court could continue it in force by means of an injunction so as to…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw