VIALPANDO
v.
PATTERSON, WARDEN

U.S. | 1968-06-17
No. 1208
392 U.S. 645 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in jorma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U. S. 54.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Shiflett v. Commonwealth OF Va., 433 F.2d 124 (4th Cir. 1970)
    …ellate practice, did he advise his client to seek other counsel or even that, being unfamiliar with Virginia practice, he was unable to act. The constitutional right to the assistance of counsel for purposes of appeal was abridged. Caton v. Alabama, 392 U.S. 645, 88 S.Ct. 2298, 20 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1968); Swenson v. Bosler, 386 U.S. 258, 87 S.Ct. 996, 18 L.Ed.2d 33 (1967); Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963); Allred v. Peyton, 385 F. 2d 360 (4 Cir. 1967); Magee v. Peyton, 343…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw