HEARD ET AL.

v.

RIZZO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Comstock v. United States, 419 F.2d 1128 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …differently from the one challenged and upheld in Woodard v. United States, supra, which the majority finds distinguishable. (Maj. op. p. 1130) The recent case of Heard v. Rizzo, 281 F.Supp. 720 (E.D.Pa.1968, three-judge court), affirmed per curiam, 392 U.S. 646, 88 S.Ct. 2307, 20 L.Ed.2d 1358 supports this proposition. In Heard the constitutionality of the Pennsylvania Riot Statute (18 P.S. § 4401) was upheld. The statute read in part as follows: “ ‘Whoever participates in any riot, rout, unlawful assemb…
• United States v. Matthews, 419 F.2d 1177 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
  …ot statute was declared unconstitutional. See International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union v. Ackerman, 82 F.Supp. 65 (D. Hawaii 1948), rev’d, 187 F. 2d 860 (9th Cir. 1951). But see Heard v. Rizzo, 281 F.Supp. 720 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d per curiam, 392 U.S. 646, 88 S.Ct. 2307, 20 L.Ed.2d 1358 (1968); Landry v. Daley, 280 F. Supp. 938. (N.D.Ill.1967), appeal dismissed sub nom., Landry v. Boyle, 393 U.S. 220, 89 S.Ct. 455, 21 L.Ed.2d 392 (1968). . See S.Rep. No. 912, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. 25-26 (1967); see…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Abernathy v. Conroy, 429 F.2d 1170 (4th Cir. 1970)
  …e L.J. 623 (1970). We use the term violence as it is normally thought of— i. e., “execution of physical force so as to injure or abuse [persons or property].” Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary. . 281 F.Supp. 720 (E.D.Penn.1968), affirmed, 392 U.S. 646, 88 S.Ct. 2307, 20 L.Ed.2d 1358 (1968). . 281 F.Supp. at 740. . E. g., Swift and Co. v. Wickham, 382 U.S. 111, 114-115, 86 S.Ct. 258, 15 L. Ed.2d 194 (1965) ; Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31, 33, 82 S.Ct. 549, 7 L.Ed.2d 512 (1962) ; Green v. Boar…

  ← 1 / 2 →