WHEAT
v.
WASHINGTON

U.S. | 1968-06-17
No. 1301
Mr. Justice Black dissents., Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Black’s dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, 532, and Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138., Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, 540, and Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138.
392 U.S. 652 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 20 L. Ed. 2d 1357 · 88 S. Ct. 2302 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1162 · SCDB 1967-197
Cited by 10 cases
Topics
Supreme Court Precedent In Forma Pauperis Writ Of Certiorari

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Supreme Court Precedent cases and more on FLexlaw

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases remanded to that court for reconsideration in the light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, and Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510.

Mr. Justice Black dissents.

Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Black’s dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, 532, and Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138.

Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, 540, and Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. State, 228 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 1969)
    …at 37-38 (1967) discussing the application of a Washington statute essentially identical with Florida’s F.S. 932.20 to challenge for cause. It should be noted that Aiken has been reversed partially on the basis of Witherspoon by Wheat v. Washington, 392 U.S. 652, 88 S.Ct. 2302, 20 L.Ed.2d 1357 (1968).…
  • Aiken v. Spalding, 841 F.2d 881 (9th Cir. 1988)
    …failure to exhaust state remedies. . The judgments were vacated by the United States Supreme Court which remanded for reconsideration in light of its decisions regarding death-qualified juries and joint trials of co-defendants. Wheat v. Washington, 392 U.S. 652, 88 S.Ct. 2302, 20 L.Ed.2d 1357 (1968). On remand, the Supreme Court of Washington reaffirmed the convictions. State v. Aiken, 75 Wash.2d 421, 452 P. 2d 232 (1969). The Supreme Court again reversed the judgment, insofar as it imposed the death sente…
  • Spalding v. Aiken, 460 U.S. 1093 (U.S. 1983)
    …viction and the sentence, State v. Aiken, 72 Wash. 2d 306, 434 P. 2d 10 (1967). On petition for certiorari to this Court, the conviction was vacated and the case remanded for reconsideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 (1968). 392 U. S. 652 (1968). After a second petition for certiorari, the conviction was again vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Maxwell v. Bishop, 398 U. S. 262 (1970), Boulden v. Holman, 394 U. S. 478 (1969), and Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 51…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw