FAIRLEY ET AL.

v.

PATTERSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.; BUNTON ET AL. V. PATTERSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.; WHITLEY ET AL. V. WILLIAMS, GOVERNOR OF MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (U.S. 1969)
  …Code did not come within the purview of and are not covered by § 5, and dismissed the complaints.11 Appellants brought direct appeals to this Court.12 We consolidated the cases and postponed consideration of jurisdiction to a hearing on the merits. 392 U. S. 902 (1968). No. 3, Allen v. State Board of Elections, concerns a bulletin issued by the Virginia Board of Elections to all election judges. The bulletin was an attempt to modify the provisions of § 24 — 252 of the Code of Virginia of 1950 which provide…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Mayhue's Super Liquor Store, Inc. v. Meiklejohn, 426 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …Part I; and Hutli v. Southern Pacific Co., 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F. 2d 526, Part I. . It is often a court-raised threshold question. See, e. g., Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 1969, 393 U.S. 544, 89 S.Ct. 817, 22 L.Ed.2d 1; Whitley v. Williams, 1968, 392 U.S. 902, 88 S.Ct. 2052, 20 L.Ed.2d 1361; Allen v. Johnson, 5 Cir., 1969, 413 F. 2d 1218, 1219. . “The existence of a substantial question of constitutionality must be determined by the allegations of the bill of complaint. Mosher v. City of Phoenix, 287 U.…
• Ferd Allen v. Johnson, 413 F.2d 1218 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …join enforcement of such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure.” 42 U.S'.O.A. § 1973c. . Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, No. 661; Fairley v. Patterson, No. 1058 Bunton v. Patterson, No. 1059; Whitley v. Williams, No. 1174, 392 U.S. 902, 88 S.Ct. 2052, 20 L.Ed.2d 1361 (1968). . Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 1969, 393 U.S. 544, 89 S.Ct. 817, 22 L.Ed.2d 1. . “We have carefully examined and considered each of the submitted amendments. The Attorney General interposes no objections…