OELSCHLAEGER

v.

UDALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hansen v. Harris, 619 F.2d 942 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …with this view.1 While emphatic rejections [*959] of estoppel against the Government occasionally appear in passing phrases, see Dix v. Rollins, 413 F. 2d 711, 716 (8th Cir. 1969); Udall v. Oelschlaeger, 389 F. 2d 974, 977 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 909, 88 S.Ct. 2056, 20 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1968), no court of appeals has ruled that estoppel would be unavailable in all circumstances. On the contrary, no fewer than eight circuits, including this one, have stated that there are some circumstances in which…
• Otter Tail Power Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 583 F.2d 399 (8th Cir. 1978)
  …6 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1062, 98 S.Ct. 1235, 55 L.Ed.2d 762 (1978); Distrigas of Massachusetts Corp. v. FPC, 517 F. 2d 761, 765 (1st Cir. 1975); Southern California Edison Co. v. FPC, 387 F. 2d 619, 621 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 909, 88 S.Ct. 2055, 20 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1968). Accordingly, an initial examination of the relevant statutory provisions is required. The Act nowhere defines initial rates or changed rates. Instead, the distinction arises from the basic statutory scheme th…
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Atl. Richfield Co., 567 F.2d 96 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …; Gueory v. Hampton, 167 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 4-5, 510 F. 2d 1222, 1225-1226 (1974); Gulf Oil Corp. v. Hickel, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 368, 372-373, 435 F. 2d 440, 444-445 (1970); Udall v. Oelschlaeger, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 13, 15, 389 F. 2d 974, 976, cert, denied, 392 U.S. 909, 88 S.Ct. 2056, 20 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1968). . I do not join in Part II of the majority opinion, or intimate any view as to how the rules should be interpreted. . See note 5 supra and accompanying text. . Enforcement of the subpoena against Atlantic,…