FORT

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• McCRAE v. State, 437 So. 2d 1388 (Fla. 1983)
  …adversely to the movant on their merits. Pitts v. Turner, 362 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Neal v. State, 349 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Mitchell v. State, 203 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), cert. denied, 210 So. 2d 224 (Fla.), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 913, 88 S.Ct. 2073, 20 L.Ed.2d 1371 (1968); Coleman v. State, 183 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). A “second or successive motion for similar relief,” as used in Rule 3.850 has thus been interpreted to mean a motion stating substantially the same groun…
• Silva v. State, 226 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
  …riefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Mitchell v. State, 203 So. 2d 676 (Fla.App.1967), cert. den. 392 U.S. 913, 88 S.Ct. 2073, 20 L.Ed.2d 1371, (1968). JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.…
• State v. Biesendorfer, 244 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
  …review under motions filed pursuant to CrPR 1.850. Such issues are res judicata. Culberson v. State (Fla.App.1969), 224 So. 2d 363; Whitney v. State (Fla.App.1966), 184 So. 2d 207; Mitchell v. State (Fla.App.1967), 203 So. 2d 676; certiorari denied, 392 U.S. 913, 88 S.Ct. 2073, 20 L.Ed.2d 1371. The other issues raised by appellant have not been overlooked, but in view of the foregoing holding we do not deem comment upon them necessary to disposition of the appeal. The order of the trial court dated July 2…