ZIMMERMAN

v.

WARDEN, MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

Citator

Cited By

• McCRAY v. Sullivan, 509 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …rotection due the right to access to the courts. See Eisenhardt v. Britton, 478 F. 2d 855 (CA5, 1973); Barlow v. Amiss, 477 F. 2d 896 (CA5, 1973); Frye v. Henderson, 474 F. 2d 1263 (CA5, 1973); Schack v. Wainwright, 391 F. 2d 608 (CA5), cert. denied 392 U.S. 915, 88 S.Ct. 2078, 20 L.Ed.2d 1375 (1968). The. restrictions in the present case may amount to an unconstitutional infringement on this right. Prison authorities have the authority to impose regulations on the time, place and manner in which punitive i…
• Taylor v. Sterrett, 532 F.2d 462 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …. Sullivan, 5 Cir. 1975, 509 F. 2d 1332; Eisenhardt v. Britton, 5 Cir. 1973, 478 F. 2d 855; Barlow v. Amiss, 5 Cir. 1973, 477 F. 2d 896; Frye v. Henderson, 5 Cir. 1973, 474 F. 2d 1263; Schack v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 391 F. 2d 608, cert. denied, 1968, 392 U.S. 915, 88 S.Ct. 2078, 20 L.Ed.2d 1375. We recognized in McCray that “ ‘[a]n inmate’s right of unfettered access to the courts is as fundamental a right as any other he may hold. . All other rights of an inmate are illusory without it . . . 509 F. 2d at 13…
• Frye v. Henderson, 474 F.2d 1263 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …, much less allege, that the manner of processing his outgoing mail has denied him free access to courts which would warrant judicial interference in this internal prison matter. Schack v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1968, 391 F. 2d 608, cert. denied 1968, 392 U.S. 915, 88 S.Ct. 2078, 20 L.Ed.2d 1375. See also Perry v. Jones, 5th Cir. 1971, 437 F. 2d 759. Actual censorship of attorney-inmate mail — be it incoming or outgoing —might very well infringe unconstitutionally in the prisoner’s rights of access to the co…