MOSDEN

v.

MICHIGAN

Citator

Cited By

• Anderson v. Nosser, 438 F.2d 183 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …deral courts entertain some reluctance to interfere with a prison’s internal discipline. See Roy v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1969, 418 F. 2d 231; Granville v. Hunt, 5 Cir. 1969, 411 F. 2d 9, 12; Schack v. Florida, 5 Cir. 1968, 391 F. 2d 593, cert. denied, 392 U.S. 916, 88 S.Ct. 2080, 20 L.Ed.2d 1376. This policy is based on the fear that judicial scrutiny of the decisions of prison officials would undermine the authority of those officials and is reinforced by the view that “lawful incarceration may properly oper…
• Newman v. State OF Ala. & Bill Baxley, 503 F.2d 1320 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …been sedulously mindful of its circumscribed role, see, e. g., Campbell v. Beto, 460 F. 2d 765, 767 (5th Cir. 1972); Sinclair v. Henderson, 435 F. 2d 125, 126 (5th Cir. 1970); Schack v. State of Florida, 391 F. 2d 593, 594 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 916, 88 S.Ct. 2080, 20 L.Ed.2d 1376 (1968), and the foundation to which this role is pinioned. The underpinnings of judicial deference were recently articulated in Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, 94 [*1329] S.Ct. 1800, 1807, 40 L.Ed.2d 224, 235 (19…
• Granville v. Hunt, 411 F.2d 9 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …administration of prison systems, and we have done so only in exceptional cases and then only when the available administrative remedies within the prison organization had been exhausted. Schack v. Florida, 5 Cir. 1968, 391 F. 2d 593, cert, denied, 392 U.S. 916, 88 S.Ct. 2080, 20 L.Ed.2d 1376; cf. Hess v. Blackwell, 5 Cir. 1968, 409 F. 2d 362. However invoked and regardless of the judicial tool employed to involve the Federal judiciary, our surveillance of state penal and correctional institutions has a li…