HARRIS, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE (WALKER, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST)

v.

NELSON, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 (U.S. 1969)
  …created Maryland Court of Special Appeals, petitioner’s double jeopardy claim was rejected on the merits. 1 Md. App. 647, 232 A. 2d. 541 (1967). The Court of Appeals denied discretionary review. On the last day of last Term, we granted certiorari, 392 U. S. 925 (1968), but limited the writ to the consideration of two issues: [*787] After oral argument, it became clear that the existence of a concurrent sentence on the burglary count might prevent the Court from reaching the double jeopardy issue, at least…
• Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374 (U.S. 1969)
  …The petitioner then sought certiorari in this Court. After inviting [*376] and receiving a memorandum from the Solicitor General of the United States, 390 U. S. 937, we granted certiorari to consider the constitutional questions this case presents. 392 U. S. 925. In refusing to issue a writ of mandamus, the Supreme Court of Texas relied upon and reaffirmed its decision of a year earlier in Cooper v. State, 400 S. W. 2d 890.4 In that ease, as in the present one, a state criminal charge was pending against a…
• Harris v. Nelson, 394 U.S. 286 (U.S. 1969)
  …heir use for discovery. Wilson v. Harris, 378 F. 2d 141 (1967). Because of the importance of the questions presented and the diversity of views among the district and appellate courts that have considered the problem,1 we granted [*290] certiorari. 392 U. S. 925. We agree with the Ninth Circuit that Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is not applicable to habeas corpus proceedings and that 28 U. S. C. § 2246 does not authorize interrogatories except in limited circumstances not applicable to thi…