STEVENS INDUSTRIES, INC.

v.

MARYLAND CASUALTY CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Cottonwood Mall Shopping Ctr., Inc. v. Utah Power & Light Co., 440 F.2d 36 (10th Cir. 1971)
  …. 2d 729, 731. . See Stool v. J. C. Penney Co., 5 Cir., 1968, 404 F. 2d 562; Insurance Co. of North America v. English, 5 Cir., 1968, 395 F. 2d 854; Stevens Industries, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 5 Cir., 1968, 391 F. 2d 411, cert. denied, 1968, 392 U.S. 926, 88 S.Ct. 2285, 20 L.Ed.2d 1386. . “The term ‘electrical corporation’ includes every corporation and person, their lessees, trustees and receivers or trustees appointed by any court whatsoever, owning, controlling, operating or managing any electri…
• Ranger Ins. Co. v. Mrs. Miriam G. Culberson, 454 F.2d 857 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …uch terms would reasonably be understood by the insured, that Culberson would be covered under the circumstances that later occurred? Ga.Code Ann. § 20-702; Stevens Industries, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 5 Cir. 1968, 391 F. 2d 411, cert, denied, 392 U.S. 926, 88 S.Ct. 2285, 20 L.Ed.2d 1386; Loftin v. U. S. Fire Ins. Co., 1962, 106 Ga.App. 287, 127 S.E. 2d 53; Royal Indemnity v. McClatchey, 1960, 101 Ga.App. 507, 114 S.E. 2d 394. We must look at the policy as a totality, using the usual rules of construc…
• The HERTZ Corp. v. COX, 430 F.2d 1365 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …nd to decide this case as would a Georgia court based upon the law of Georgia. Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938); Stevens Industries, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Company, 391 F. 2d 411 (5 Cir. 1968); cert. den. 392 U.S. 926, 88 S.Ct. 2285, 20 L.Ed.2d 1386 (1968); Birkett L. Williams Company v. Smith, 353 F. 2d 60 (5 Cir. 1965). At common law, scienter is an essential element in an action for damages based upon fraud.5 While there is [*1374] a trend against strict requ…