YICK CHIN

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• AMF Inc. v. Sleekcraft Boats, 599 F.2d 341 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …mark entitled to a restricted range of protection. Thus, only if the marks are quite similar, and the goods closely related, will infringement be found. See Westward Coach Manufacturing Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 388 F. 2d 627, 634 (CA 7), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 927, 88 S.Ct. 2286, 20 L.Ed.2d 1386 (1968) (weak mark protected only against similar goods, similarly marketed). 2. Proximity of the goods For related goods, the danger presented is that the public will mistakenly assume there is an association betwee…
• Kicklighter v. Nails BY Jannee, Inc., 616 F.2d 734 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …the trial court errs in giving the charge when there is no rational basis in the evidence from which the jury could find the necessary prerequisite elements of the doctrine. See Cater v. Gordon Transport Inc., 390 F. 2d 44 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 927, 88 S.Ct. 2285, 20 L.Ed.2d 1386 (1968). Upon careful review of the evidence in this case, we conclude that the evidence did not provide a rational basis from which the jury could have found the presence of the necessary res ipsa loquitur preconditio…
• United States v. Bufalino, 576 F.2d 446 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …attorneys concerned, Judge Lasker decided to conduct a voir dire of the jurors individually in chambers, outside the presence of counsel. We sanctioned this very procedure in United States v. Miller, 381 F. 2d 529, 540 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 927, 88 S.Ct. 2273, 20 L.Ed.2d 1387 (1968). Judge Lasker’s decision to use it, in response to a request from Sparber’s attorney, elicited no objection. Counsel for Jacobs was specifically asked if the voir dire would be acceptable to him, and he voiced…