HONEA

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Mizell v. The Attorney Gen. OF the State OF NEW York & ano., 586 F.2d 942 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …hat if a defendant were tried in a federal court, jeopardy would attach as soon as the jury was sworn. See Illinois v. Somerville, supra; United States ex rel. Bland v. Nenna, 282 F.Supp. 754 (S.D.N.Y.), aff d, 393 F. 2d 416 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 392 U.S. 941, 88 S.Ct. 2323, 20 L.Ed.2d 1403 (1968). Under Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 328, 58 S.Ct. 149, 153, 82 L.Ed.2d 288 (1937) it was reasonably clear that federal double jeopardy standards did not apply to the states and that the Fourteenth Amen…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Clay v. Riddle, 541 F.2d 456 (4th Cir. 1976)
  …on the broad holding that it does not apply to misdemeanor charges, see: State v. Gabriel-son, Iowa, 192 N.W. 2d 792 (1971); State v. Pyle, 19 Ohio St.2d 64, 249 N.E. 2d 826 (1969); Capler v. City of Greenville, Miss., 207 So. 2d 339, cert. denied, 392 U.S. 941, 88 S.Ct. 2323, 20 L.Ed.2d 1403 (1968); State v. Angelo, 251 La. 250, 203 So. 2d 710 (1967); 31 A.L.R.3d 579, 692; and 25 A.L.R.3d 1081-86. In neither phase of this discussion have we found significant Federal decisions holding against the views her…