ROVICO, INC.
v.
AMERICAN PHOTOCOPY EQUIPMENT CO.

U.S. | 1968-06-17
No. 906
392 U.S. 947 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Duncan v. Leander H. Perez, Jr., 445 F.2d 557 (5th Cir. 1971)
    …e ground that Duncan had been deprived of his constitutional right to trial by jury, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed the conviction. Duncan v. Louisiana, 1968, 391 U.S. 145, 88 S.Ct. 1444, 20 L. Ed.2d 491, reh. denied 392 U.S. 947, 88 S.Ct. 2270, 20 L.Ed.2d 1412. On January 3, 1969, appellee instituted this action pursuant to Title 42, U.S. C. § 1983, Title 28, U.S.C. § 1343(3) and Title 28, U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202, in an effort to bar his retrial on the simple battery charge.2…
  • United States v. Martin, 704 F.2d 267 (6th Cir. 1983)
    …ing that his jury trial waiver was not knowing and intelligent. I. JURY TRIAL • Trial by jury is fundamental to American criminal jurisprudence. See Duncan v. State of Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149, 88 S.Ct. 1444, 1447, 20 L.Ed.2d 491, reh. denied 392 U.S. 947, 88 S.Ct. 2270, 20 L.Ed.2d 1412 (1968). In fact, the role of the jury as a fact finding body in criminal cases is so indispensible that it is preserved by the Constitution. Article III, § 2 of the Constitution states: “The Trial of all crimes, excep…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw