GUERRA

v.

MISSISSIPPI

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Pickus v. United States Bd. OF Parole, 507 F.2d 1107 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …lations. Lewis-Mota v. Secretary of Labor, 2d Cir. 1972, 469 F. 2d 478, 482; Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, 3d Cir. 1969, 412 F. 2d 740, 744; National Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n v. United States, D.D.C.1967, 268 F.Supp. 90, 95-97, aff’d, 393 U.S. 18, 89 S.Ct. 49, 21 L.Ed.2d 19; cf., Public Service Commission of State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, 1967, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 26, 373 F. 2d 816; rev’d in part on other grounds, 1968, 391 U.S. 9, 88 S.Ct. 1526, 20 L.Ed.2d 388; see also Seaboar…
• Batterton v. Marshall, 648 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …d by the agency to challenge action in order to discern its real intent and effect. See Chamber of Commerce v. OSHA, 636 F. 2d 464, at 468 (D.C. Cir. 1980); Nat’l Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 90, 95 (D.D.C. 1967), aff'd, 393 U.S. 18, 89 S.Ct. 49, 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968). See also Nat’l Nutritional Foods Ass’n v. Weinberger, 512 F. 2d 688, 696 (2d Cir. 1975) (label alone does not determine whether agency action is authoritative). . Joseph v. United States Civil Service Comm’n, 554…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Standard OIL Co. v. Dep't OF Energy, 596 F.2d 1029 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1978)
  …general, it is necessary to expose that action “to the test of prior examination and comment by the affected parties.” National Motor Freight Traffic Association v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 90, 96 (D.D.C.1976) (three judge court) aff’d per curiam, 393 U.S. 18, 89 S.Ct. 49, 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968). The APA’s rulemaking procedures “were designed to assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application”. NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., 394 U.S. 759, 764, 89 S.Ct. 1426, 1429, 22 L.Ed.2d 709 (1969)…