MUNIZ

v.

BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• Hegeman-Harris Co., Inc. v. ALL State Pipe Supply Co., Inc., 400 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
  …ies persons for disparate treatment, where the classification is arbitrary or where there is no difference in the classes having a substantial relation to the purpose of the legislation. State v. Andersen, 208 So. 2d 814 (Fla.1968), appeal dismissed 393 U.S. 22, 89 S.Ct. 49, 21 L.Ed.2d 18 (1968); Hunter v. Flowers, 43 So. 2d 435 (Fla.1949). Essentially the entire mechanics’ lien law is for the benefit of lienors and is to afford the lienor adequate assurance of being fully compensated for his labor, servi…
• Muniz v. Beto, 434 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …lowing language: “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal herein be, and it is hereby, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. “Treating the papers wherein the appeal was taken as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, certiorari is denied.” Muniz v. Beto, 393 U.S. 22, 89 S.Ct. 51, 21 L.Ed.2d 22 (1968). In addition to his appeal, Applicant also petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for Writ of Certiorari in Muniz v. Beto, No. 722 Misc., in which the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Muniz v. Beto, 3…

  ← 1 / 2 →