HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS' BUREAU ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. Brinke, 475 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …r transportation rate applicable to full truckload or carload lots. The difference between the two freight rates accounts for his gross profit. Household Goods Carriers’ Bureau v. United States, N.D.Cal.1968, 288 F.Supp. 641, 642, aff’d per curiam, 393 U.S. 265, 89 S.Ct. 477, 21 L.Ed.2d 426; see also Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United States, S.D.N.Y.1940, 30 F.Supp. 968, 969-971, aff’d per curiam, 309 U.S. 638, 60 S.Ct. 810, 84 L.Ed. 993. Freight forwarders are to be distinguished on the one hand from rai…
• Global van Lines, Inc. v. The United States, 456 F.2d 717 (Ct. Cl. 1972)
  …forwarders. The ICC decided this question in the affirmative. Subsequently, the administrative decision in Kingpak, Inc., was upheld by a 3-judge court in Household Goods Carrier’s Bureau v. United States, 288 F. Supp. 641 (N.D.Cal.1968), affirmed, 393 U.S. 265, 89 S.Ct. 477, 21 L.Ed.2d 426 (1968). In Kingpak, Inc., 103 M.C.C. at p. 325, the ICC described a freight forwarder “as one who specializes in the transportation of less-than-carload and less-thán-truckload freight and who undertakes to see to it t…
• Three WAY Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 792 F.2d 232 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
  …d-crate, and government commodities traffic. See Joint Brief for Respondents ICC & USA, addendum B, at 1; see also Household Goods’ Carrier Bureau v. United States, 288 F.Supp. 641 (N.D.Cal.) (discussing what constitutes Kingpak traffic), affd mem., 393 U.S. 265, 89 S.Ct. 477, 21 L.Ed.2d 426 (1968). Any carrier agent holding interstate authority involving more than those limited classes of traffic had to transfer or otherwise dispose of its certificate to remain within the Atlas network. In determining wh…