NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• The Associated Press v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 448 F.2d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …by statute. Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern R. Co., 372 U.S. 658, 83 S.Ct. 984, 10 L.Ed.2d 52 (1963). Nor may we review a refusal to suspend. National Industrial Traffic League v. United States, 287 F.Supp. 129 (D.D.C.1968), aff’d per curiam, 393 U.S. 535, 89 S.Ct. 873, 21 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969); Movers’ & Warehousemen’s Ass’n of America v. United States, 227 F.Supp. 249 (D.D.C.1964); Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. United States, 179 F.Supp. 605, 610 (D.Del. 1959), vacated and dismissed as moot, 364 U.S. 28…
• The Cincinnati v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 441 F.2d 483 (4th Cir. 1971)
  …Southern Ry. Co., 372 U.S. 658, 83 S.Ct. 984, 10 L.Ed.2d 52 (1963). By the same token, the Commission’s refusal to suspend rates is also not reviewable. National Industrial Traffic League v. United States, 287 F.Supp. 129, 132 (D.D.C.1968), aff’d 393 U.S. 535, 89 S.Ct. 873, 21 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969). Instead of pursuing the administrative remedies which the Commission expressly reserved, the railroads opposing the tariff abandoned the Commission as a forum, ignored the tariff, and awaited the inevitable sui…