FEDERAL MARINE TERMINALS, INC.

v.

BURNSIDE SHIPPING CO., LTD.

Citator

Cited By

• Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1969)
  …termined that such a plea was voluntarily and knowingly entered by the defendant,” but refusing “ [f] or aught appearing” “to presume that the trial judge failed to do his duty.” 281 Ala., at 662, 663, 207 So. 2d, at 414, 416. We granted certiorari. 393 U. S. 820. Respondent does not suggest that we lack jurisdiction to review the voluntary character of petitioner’s guilty plea because he failed to raise that federal question below and the state court failed to pass upon it.3 But the question was raised on…
• Fortner Enters., Inc. v. United States Steel Corp., 394 U.S. 495 (U.S. 1969)
  …ites of illegality under our tying cases, namely [*498] sufficient market power over the tying product and foreclosure of a substantial volume of commerce in the tied product. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion, and we granted certiorari, 393 U. S. 820 (1968). Since we find no basis for sustaining this summary judgment, we reverse and order that the case proceed to trial. We agree with the District Court that the conduct challenged here primarily involves a tying arrangement of the traditional ki…
• Fed. Marine Terminals, Inc. v. Burnside Shipping Co., Ltd., 394 U.S. 404 (U.S. 1969)
  …the third person within six months of the award, as in this case, the employer’s liability for compensation is reduced by the amount recovered by the representative from the third person. See §33 (f), supra, n. 1. 284 F. Supp. 740. 392 F. 2d 918. 393 U. S. 820. The District Court found that crucial factual issues existed regarding the longshoremen’s knowledge of the open hatch and the parties’ relative duties of inspection. McNeill had been present at the time the hatch lids were “winged out,” but the co…