SCOFIELD ET AL.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Johnson v. State, 354 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …should have been granted because the sample was obtained as a result of an illegal arrest. It affirmatively appears from this record that the defendant’s arrest was not for the [*124] purpose of obtaining his fingerprint as in Davis v. Mississippi, 393 U.S. 821, 89 S.Ct. 149, 21 L.Ed.2d 93 (1968). Defendant’s arrest was based upon an account of an eyewitness who provided specific information of defendant’s acts and a sufficient description of the defendant to support his identification as the culprit. The…
• Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731 (U.S. 1969)
  …District Court for the District of Oregon. The District Court granted the writ, but the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, 388 F. 2d 777 (1968). We [*733] granted certiorari to consider three contentions of error raised by petitioner. 393 U. S. 821 (1968). Although petitioner’s case has been ably briefed and argued by appointed counsel, we find none of these allegations sufficient to warrant reversal. I. Petitioner’s first argument centers on certain allegedly prejudicial remarks made during…
• Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721 (U.S. 1969)
  …jections that the fingerprints should be excluded as the product of an unlawful detention. The Mississippi Supreme Court sustained the admission of the fingerprint evidence and affirmed the conviction. 204 So. 2d 270 (1967). We granted certiorari. 393 U. S. 821 (1968). We reverse. At the outset, we find no merit in the suggestion in the Mississippi Supreme Court’s opinion that fingerprint evidence, because of its trustworthiness, is not subject to the proscriptions of the Fourth and Fourteenth [*724] Ame…