GRIMES ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Tapia v. Rodriguez, 446 F.2d 410 (10th Cir. 1971)
  …deposition relating to the defendant’s prior convictions, this court held that the admission of such testimony, even lacking objection by de [*415] fense counsel, was plain error. Dillon v. United States, 391 F. 2d 433 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 825, 89 S.Ct. 87, 21 L.Ed.2d 96 (1968). Where the prosecutor, on cross-examination, asked the defendant with respect to a conviction which was then pending on appeal, to which no answer was given and no defense action taken, such was harmless error. Dru…
• Duggar v. United States, 434 F.2d 345 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476, overruling Delli Paoli v. United States, 352 U.S. 232, 77 S.Ct. 294, 1 L.Ed.2d 278. Thereafter, on October 14, 1968, the Supreme Court denied Duggar’s petition for certiorari. See 393 U.S. 825, 89 S.Ct. 87, 21 L.Ed.2d 96. In footnote 5 to his dissenting opinion to the decision of the Second Circuit affirming the conviction of Delli Paoli (United States v. Delli Paoli, 2 Cir., 229 F. 2d 319, at 323) Circuit Judge Frank said: “Often when,…