WINKLER

v.

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Fernandez, 428 F.2d 578 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …a; United States v. Moore, 290 F. 2d 501 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 837, 82 S.Ct. 49, 7 L.Ed.2d 38 (1961); United States v. Lester, 247 F. 2d 496 (2d Cir. 1957). See United States v. Komitor, 392 F. 2d 520 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 827, 89 S.Ct. 91, 21 L.Ed.2d 98 (1968). Here there is no possible basis for such reversal. Finally, Fernandez argues that, as a matter of law, there could be no factual basis for his plea because he could not have violated 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) since h…
• The United States v. A. N. Deringer, Inc., 593 F.2d 1015 (C.C.P.A. 1979)
  …n of the Customs Court never attached.13 The government notes a certain similarity between the reasoning of the Customs Court in the cases at bar and our decisions in United States v. Cajo Trading, Inc., 55 C.C.P.A. 61, 403 F. 2d 268, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 827, 89 S.Ct. 90, 21 L.Ed.2d 98 (1968) and United States v. C. O. Mason, Inc., 51 C.C.P.A. 107 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 999, 85 S.Ct. 718, 13 L.Ed.2d 701 (1965), and suggests that now is an appropriate time to overrule those cases. The Cajo and Ma…
• Omni U.S.A., Inc. v. The United States, 840 F.2d 912 (Fed. Cir. 1988)
  …eory as no longer valid in this court. In Deringer our predecessor, the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, was asked to overrule two of its previous holdings, United States v. Cajo Trading, Inc., 55 CCPA (Customs) 61, 403 F. 2d 268, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 827, 89 S.Ct. 90, 21 L.Ed. 2d 98 (1968), and United States v. C.O. Mason, Inc., 51 CCPA (Customs) 107 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 999, 85 S.Ct. 718, 13 L.Ed.2d 701 (1965). Those two cases applied the “void liquidation” theory to arrange for the survi…