EASTERN SHOPPING CENTERS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 1966-12-07
No. 6996
ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ-, concur.
192 So. 2d 785 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1966)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that there were no reversible errors in the condemnation trial record.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant appealed a jury verdict of $6,000 in a condemnation case. The State's appraiser valued the property at $5,500 after adjustments, while t…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, defendant below, appeals from a final judgment in a condemnation case tried before a jury. The appellant was awarded a verdict of $6,000 for its piece of property.

The condemnation trial was conducted with only two witnesses, an appraiser for the State and an appraiser for the appellant. The appraiser for the appellant placed a value of $11,000 on the property. The appraiser for the State Road Department placed a value on the property also at $11,-000 but made adjustments which, in his opinion, ultimately placed the value of the parcel taken at $5,500. The jury awarded the appellant $6,000 and final judgment was entered on this sum.

The appraiser for the State. Road Department looked to the values placed on land near the parcel in question and made his adjustments based upon these other land values to arrive at the valuation for appellant’s property. The land value was adjusted on the following bases: 1) size of property; 2) elevation of property; 3) front footage, exposure; and 4) use of property taken.

*786It was a matter for the jury to decide the value of the property based on the testimony of the two valuation experts.

We find no reversible error in the record and affirm the lower court.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ-, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw