GORMAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Burkett v. State, 518 So. 2d 1363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …quoted legislative language to the effect that it is a "final judgment of conviction” from which a defendant has the right to appeal. . State v. Davis, 203 So. 2d 160 (Fla.1967). . See DePugh v. United States, 393 F. 2d 367 (8th Cir.), cert. den., 393 U.S. 832, 89 S.Ct. 101, 21 L.Ed.2d 102 (1968). . See Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55, 100 S.Ct. 915, 63 L.Ed.2d 198 (1980), discussed in United States v. Bagley, 659 F.Supp. 223 (W.D. Wash.1987), in which the Court held that section 1202(a)(1) "prohibit…
• United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …evidence would be relevant if it could have so shown, we do conclude that in any event there was no abuse of discretion in excluding additional evidence on the plan’s merits. United States v. Gorman, 393 F. 2d 209, 212 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 832, 89 S.Ct. 102, 21 L.Ed.2d 103. B. Prior Similar Payments Received by Hoffman Estates Officials The district court permitted defendant to ask each village official who testified whether he had “ever received money which came from other builders for…
• United States v. Foster, 789 F.2d 457 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …e.” Id. (emphasis supplied). A § 7203 misdemeanor requires proof that (1) the defendant had a legal duty to file a tax return; (2) he failed to do so; and (3) he acted willfully. United States v. Gorman, 393 F. 2d 209, 213 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 832, 89 S.Ct. 102, 21 L.Ed.2d 103 (1968). There is no requirement of an affirmative act, whereas a § 7201 offense requires some affirmative act. Failure to file without more will not sustain a conviction under § 7201. United States v. Spies, 317 U.S. 49…