HANSEN
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1968-10-14
No. 174
393 U.S. 833 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Caution
Cited by 47 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (24 total)

  • United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  • United States v. Skillman, 442 F.2d 542 (8th Cir. 1971)
    …f defendant had properly raised the Rule 16 issue, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion in admitting competent evidence not previously disclosed under Rule 16(g). See Hansen v. United States, 393 F. 2d 763 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 833, 89 S.Ct. 103, 21 L.Ed.2d 103 (1968). Defendant alleges further that a proper foundation for introduction of the tape for purposes of impeachment had not been laid, since there was no direction as to time, place, or circumstance of the making of th…
  • United States v. Flaherty, 668 F.2d 566 (1st Cir. 1981)
    …States v. Haldeman, 559 F. 2d 31, 78 n.112 (D.C.Cir.1976); United States v. Owen, 492 F. 2d 1100, 1110 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 965, 95 S.Ct. 227, 42 L.Ed.2d 180 (1974); Hansen v. United States, 393 F. 2d 763, 770 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 833, 89 S.Ct. 103, 21 L.Ed.2d 103 (1968). Appellants have made no showing in this case that their substantial rights were in any way prejudiced by the nondisclosure of the Government’s investigative file. They had no statutory right to the material, a…

Previewing 3 of 24 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw