MCFARLAND

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Kishin Ramchand Balani v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 669 F.2d 1157 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …e Attorney General of the United States the responsibility of exercising discretion in immigration matters. The Courts will not substitute their discretion for that of the Attorney General. Chen v. Foley, 385 F. 2d 929 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 838, 89 S.Ct. 115, 21 L.Ed.2d 109 (1968). The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion in this case. The judgment of the Board of Immigration Appeals is affirmed. . On February 25, 1972, the Petitioner applied for permanent resident s…
• Adnan Sadik Faddah and Laina Kaarina Faddah v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 553 F.2d 491 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …stment of status under section 245. See, e. g., Lee v. INS, 9 Cir., 1971, 446 F. 2d 881; Ameeriar v. INS, 3 Cir., 1971, 438 F. 2d 1028, cert. denied, 404 U.S. 801, 92 S.Ct. 21, 30 L.Ed.2d 34; Chen v. Foley, 6 Cir., 1967, 385 F. 2d 929, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 838, 89 S.Ct. 115, 21 L.Ed.2d 109; see also INS v. Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24, 97 S.Ct. 200, 50 L.Ed.2d 190 (1976); Tuan v. INS, 5 Cir., 1976, 531 F. 2d 1337, 1338. In his July 2 opinion, the immigration judge also found that Faddah had acquired a proffer…
• United States v. Kirkman, 426 F.2d 747 (4th Cir. 1970)
  …e court. We recognize that forfeiture and remission are matters within the sound discretion of the district judge. See, e. g., Brown v. United States, 410 F. 2d 212 (5th Cir. 1969); United States v. Egan, 394 F. 2d 262 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 838, 89 S.Ct. 116, 21 L.Ed.2d 109 (1968); Sifuentes-Romero v. United States, 374 F. 2d 620 (5th Cir. 1967); Fed.R.Crim.P. 46(f) (2). On review the question for this court is whether the district judge abused his discretion in refusing to order remission…