LOTHRIDGE ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Mays, 549 F.2d 670 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …resenting such prejudice is on the defendant. United States v. Griffin, 464 F. 2d 1352, 1354-1355 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009, 93 S.Ct. 447, 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1973); United States v. Hauff, 395 F. 2d 555, 557 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 843, 89 S.Ct. 124, 21 L.Ed.2d 113 (1968). To establish actual prejudice sufficient to warrant a dismissal, the defendant must show not only the loss of the witness and/or evidence but also just demonstrate how that loss is prejudicial to him.12 Marion…
• United States v. Birney, 686 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1982)
  …acker, 628 F. 2d 1250, 1254 (9th Cir. 1980). See also United States v. Elsbery, 602 F. 2d 1054, 1059 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 994, 100 S.Ct. 529, 62 L.Ed.2d 425 (1979); United States v. Hauff, 395 F. 2d 555, 556-57 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 843, 89 S.Ct. 124, 21 L.Ed.2d 113 (1968). To sustain her burden of proof, the defendant must “demonstrate how [the loss of evidence] is prejudicial” to her. United States v. Mays, 549 F. 2d 670, 677 (9th Cir. 1977). Without definite proof as to this ess…
• Gull Airborne Instruments, Inc. v. Caspar W. Weinberger, 694 F.2d 838 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
  …nnell Douglas Corp., 606 F. 2d at 807; Brundage v. United States, 504 F. 2d 1382, 1386 (Ct.Cl.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998, 95 S.Ct. 2395, 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975); Grisham v. United [*844] States, 392 F. 2d 980, 983, 183 Ct.Cl. 657, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 843, 89 S.Ct. 125, 21 L.Ed.2d 114 (1968). Gull instituted this action three years from the date the contract was awarded, six months from the GAO’s denial of its last protest, and three years before the statute of limitations had run on its claim.6 Gul…