O'HALLORAN

v.

RUNDLE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• King & King Enters. v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147 (10th Cir. 1981)
  …ph E. Seagram and Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., 416 F. 2d 71 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1062, 90 S.Ct. 752, 24 L.Ed.2d 755 (1970); and Continental Baking Co. v. Utah Pie Co., 396 F. 2d 161 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 860, 89 S.Ct. 136, 21 L.Ed.2d 128. In all of these cases; the courts held that there was an inadequate evidentiary basis for quantification of the plaintiffs’ damages. On that ground the courts held that damages based on the accountant’s calculations co…
• United States v. Erasmo Corral-Martinez, 592 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …s in determining voluntariness, and such delay must be “unnecessary” before it will render a confession inadmissible. United States v. Odom, 526 F. 2d 339, 343 (5th Cir. 1976). In Napier v. United States, 387 F. 2d 147 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 860, 89 S.Ct. 141, 21 L.Ed.2d 130 (1968), we held that a full day’s delay did not necessitate suppression of incriminating statements when the machinery to bring the suspect before the authorities had been set in motion, the appellant had been repeatedl…