AGOSTO
v.
ALASKA

U.S. | 1968-10-14
No. 18
393 U.S. 861 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Collins v. Housewright, 664 F.2d 181 (8th Cir. 1981)
    …ra, 540 F. 2d at 982-83 & n.8, citing People v. Laudermilk, 67 Cal.2d 272, 431 P. 2d 228, 238, 61 Cal.Rptr. 644, 654 (1967) (contention of defense counsel that defendant was incompetent to stand trial was of “limited probative value”), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 861, 89 S.Ct. 139, 21 L.Ed.2d 128 (1968); Jordan v. Wainwright, 457 F. 2d 338, 339 (5th Cir. 1972) (per curiam) (“[N]o sanity hearing is mandated by Pate v. Robinson, by a naked suggestion that the defendant may be incompetent.”). This is particularly t…
  • Laudermilk v. Cal. Dep't OF Corr. & W. T. Stone, 439 F.2d 1278 (9th Cir. 1971)
    …of Mr. Justice Peters of the California Supreme Court, set forth in his dissenting opinion in People v. Laudermilk, 67 Cal.2d 272, 288-296, 61 Cal.Rptr. 644, 655-660, 431 P. 2d 228, 239-244, (1967), cert. denied, sub. nom. Laudermilk v. California, 393 U.S. 861, 89 S.Ct. 139 (1968). At the point when the trial judge accepted Laudermilk’s plea, the situation was such as to require that a hearing be conducted. The judge could not, I submit, undertake to resolve the competency question, then readily apparent,…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw