JORDAN

v.

NORTH CAROLINA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Maitlen v. Maitlen, 658 F.2d 466 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …w.” In re Werth, 443 F.Supp. 738, 739 (D.Kan.1977). See also Stafos v. Jarvis, 477 F. 2d 369 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 944, 94 S.Ct. 230, 38 L.Ed.2d 168 (1973); Minnick v. Lafayette Loan & Trust Co., 392 F. 2d 973 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 875, 89 S.Ct. 170, 21 L.Ed.2d 146 (1968); In re American Beef Packers, Inc., 457 F.Supp. 313 (D.Neb.1978). The construction of the agreement in question is either a question of law or a mixed question of fact and law. The order entered July 7, 1980, was…
• In re Scarlata v. Scarlata, 979 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …and liberally in favor of the debtor.” In re Zarzynski, 771 F. 2d 304, 306 (7th Cir.1985). The burden is on the objecting creditor to prove exceptions to discharge. Minnick v. Lafayette Loan & Trust Co., 392 F. 2d 973, 976 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 875, 89 S.Ct. 170, 21 L.Ed.2d 146 (1968). Although Goldberg may have proved that Scarlata misrepresented his trading intentions, we do not believe it carried its burden to prove reliance or to prove the applicability of the “willful and malicious injury…