HUDSON
v.
UNITED STATES
HUDSON
UNITED STATES
393 U.S. 876
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
United States v. Antone, 603 F.2d 566 (5th Cir. 1979)…, is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge. United States v. Riley, 544 F. 2d 237 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932, 97 S.Ct. 1554, 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); Hudson v. United States, 387 F. 2d 331 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 876, 89 S.Ct. 172, 21 L.Ed.2d 147 (1968). Accordingly, the denial of such a motion will be reversed only where it is shown that the ruling was so clearly erroneous as to constitute an abuse of discretion. United States v. Hamilton, 559 F. 2d 1370, 1373…
-
United States v. Smaldone, 484 F.2d 311 (10th Cir. 1973)…s, 422 F. 2d 509, 512-514 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 397 U.S. 1008, 90 S.Ct. 1235, 25 L.Ed.2d 420 (1970); United States v. Mahler, 363 F. 2d 673, 677-678 (2d Cir. 1966). See also Hudson v. .United States, 387 F. 2d 331 (5th Cir. 1967), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 876, 89 S.Ct. 172, 21 L.Ed.2d 147 (1968); Orozco-Vasquez v. United States, 344 F. 2d 827 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 386 U.S. 1010, 87 S.Ct. 1354, 18 L.Ed. 2d 438 (1967).…
-
United States v. Metz, 652 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1981)…w trial is entrusted to the discretion of the trial judge, United States v. Riley, 544 F. 2d 237 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932, 97 S.Ct. 1554, 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); Hudson v. United States, 387 F. 2d 331 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 876, 89 S.Ct. 172, 21 L.Ed.2d 147 (1968); is not subject to facile reversal, United States v. Johnson, 327 U.S. 106, 66 S.Ct. 464, 90 L.Ed. 562 (1946); Lyles v. United States, 279 F. 2d 358 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 922, 81 S.Ct. 288, 5 L.Ed.2d…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence