JACKSON

v.

WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• Sostre v. McGINNIS, 442 F.2d 178 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …inmates is an essential adjunct of prison administration”). See [*200] also, Diehl v. Wainwright, 419 F. 2d 1309 (5th Cir. 1970); Abernathy v. Cunningham, 393 F. 2d 775 (4th Cir. 1968); United States v. Stahl, 393 F. 2d 101 (7th Cir.) cert. denied 393 U.S. 879, 89 S.Ct. 181, 21 L.Ed.2d 152 (1968); Carey v. Settle, 351 F. 2d 483, 485 (8th Cir. 1965).44 We note that Sostre did not contest the validity of Warden Follette’s action in striking the name of his sister from the list of Sostre’s authorized corresp…
• United States v. Conway, 415 F.2d 158 (3d Cir. 1969)
  …escription of the stolen money which had been recovered. However, it is not the function of a bill of particulars to disclose the names of Government witnesses in a case such as this. See United States v. Stahl, 393 F. 2d 101 (7th Cir.), cert. den. 393 U.S. 879, 89 S.Ct. 181, 21 L.Ed.2d 152 (1968); United States v. Margeson, 261 F.Supp. 628 (E.D.Pa.1966). Nor should it function to disclose evidentiary material. See Hemphill v. United States, 392 F. 2d 45 (8th Cir.), cert. den. 393 U.S. 877, 89 S.Ct. 176, 2…
• Peterson v. United States, 411 F.2d 1074 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …antial rights resulted from his absence at a stage of the proceedings, the courts will not overturn his conviction. Rule 52(a), Fed.R.Crim. P.; Estes v. United States, supra; Taylor v. United States, 385 F. 2d 835, 836 (8th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 879, 89 S.Ct. 181, 21 L.Ed.2d 153 (1968); Cox v. United States, 309 F. 2d 614, 616-618 (8th Cir. 1962); Glouser v. United States, 296 F. 2d 853, 855-856 (8th Cir. [*1081] 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 825, 82 S.Ct. 840, 7 L.Ed.2d 789 (1962). The record…