HINES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Willard v. United States, 422 F.2d 810 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …rly exists this way around, too. See J. Moore & T. Currier, 1B Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 0.418 [1] at 2702-13. Affirmed. . On direct appeal this Court affirmed the convictions. Willard v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 393 F. 2d 119, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 887, 89 S.Ct. 201, 21 L.Ed.2d 164. . 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(d) provides that the District Court may dismiss a case brought in forma pauperis “if the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if satisfied that the action is frivolous or malicious.” . Pursuant to…
• Wally Shelby v. Phend, 445 F.2d 1326 (7th Cir. 1971)
  …y violation of the standards of Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977, and, in any event, that appellant deliberately waived any objection to its admissibility. Shelby v. State, 249 Ind. 337, 232 N.E. 2d 363, cert. denied 393 U.S. 887, 89 S.Ct. 203, 21 L.Ed.2d 165. [*1327] On June 23, 1969, appellant, pro se filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. He claimed that his counsel was incompetent because he…