SASSO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Evans, 425 F.2d 302 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …nuing duty from day to day to report for induction to his local board and to each local board whose area he enters or in whose area he remains.” (As to the continuing duty to report, United States v. Prince, (2 Cir. 1968) 398 F. 2d 686; cert. denied 393 U.S. 946, 89 S.Ct. 322, 21 L.Ed.2d 285 (1968); Kariakin v. United States, (9 Cir. 1958) 261 F. 2d 263.) Nothing in the regulations suggests that a new order is required. 32 CFR 1632.2(d) specifically provides that no new order is required in cases of formal…
• United States v. Seymour Pollack, 534 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …ed that use of the mails to transmit proceeds or confirmation of the sale of such securities violates section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77e(a)(l). See United States v. Wolfson, 405 F. 2d 779, 783-84 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 946, 89 S.Ct. 1275, 22 L.Ed.2d 479 (1969) and cases cited therein. Sachs’s contention that there was insufficient evidence that he “engaged in the sale of unregistered securities or that unregistered securities were sold on his behalf by someone in priv…
• United States v. Garrity, 433 F.2d 649 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …reasons given for this result have varied. Some of the eases have simply said that allegations of the illegality of the war do not present a defense for refusal to submit to induction. United States v. Prince, 398 F. 2d 686 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 946, 89 S.Ct. 322, 21 L.Ed.2d 285 (1968); United States v. Pratt, 412 F. 2d 426 (6th Cir. 1969); Rusk v. United States, 419 F. 2d 133 (9th Cir. 1969). Other eases have refused this defense on the grounds of standing. It is said that an inductee has rec…