NEWARK STEREOTYPERS' UNION NO. 18

v.

NEWARK MORNING LEDGER CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. Petrucci, 525 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
  …& Professional Employees International Union, Local 2 v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 724 F. 2d 133 (D.C.Cir.1983); Newark Stereotypers’ Union No. 18 v. Newark [*922] Morning Ledger Co., 397 F. 2d 594 (3d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954, 89 S.Ct. 378, 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968); Dogherra; Liang. Only arbitral decisions which are “completely irrational” or which constitute “manifest disregard of the law” will be overturned. French; see, e.g., UNC v. GAC for an arbitral decision in such m…
• Efron v. UBS Fin. Servs. Inc. of P.R. (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
  …ction, “misconduct” means a decision “which so affects the rights of a party that it may be said that he was deprived of a fair hearing.” Newark Stereotypers’ Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F. 2d 594, 599 (3d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 (1968). Under this standard, “[t]he arbitrary denial of a reasonable request for a postponement may serve as grounds for vacating an arbitration award.” Fairchild, 516 F. Supp. at 1313 (citing Tube & Steel Corp. of Am. v. Chicago Carbon Steel Produ…
• United States ex rel. Julio Juventino Lujan v. Warden Louis Gengler, 510 F.2d 62 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …denied, 402 U.S. 909, 91 S.Ct. 1381, 28 L.Ed.2d 649 (1971); Sewell v. United States, 406 F. 2d 1289, 1292-1293 & n.2 (8th Cir. 1969); Brown v. Fogel, 387 F. 2d 692, 696 n.7 (4th Cir. 1967); Tynan v. Eyman, 371 F. 2d 764 (9th Cir. 1970), cert denied, 393 U.S. 954, 89 S.Ct. 383, 21 L.Ed.2d 366 (1968). . As the passage from Russell cited in the text indicates, the relevance of the Rochin principle is not that it provides a test which may easily be applied, see Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 74 S.Ct. 381,…