CHIMEL

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (U.S. 1969)
  …ch of the petitioner’s home [*755] had been justified, despite the absence of a search warrant, on the ground that it had been incident to a valid arrest. We granted certiorari in order to consider the petitioner’s substantial constitutional claims. 393 U. S. 958. Without deciding the question, we proceed on the hypothesis that the California courts were correct in holding that the arrest of the petitioner was valid under the Constitution. This brings us directly to the question whether the warrantless sear…
• Neidhart v. Neidhart S.A., 510 F.2d 760 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …rbenfabriken Bayer, A.G., 1968 Trade Cases ¶ 72,569 (D.C.D.C.), leave to appeal denied, C.A.D.C. No. 586-68, Misc. No. 3277, 1968 Trade Cases ¶ 72,570, appeal dismissed, 393 U.S. 216, 89 S.Ct. 397, 21 L.Ed.2d 358, leave to petition for cert, denied, 393 U.S. 958, 89 S.Ct. 412, 21 L.Ed.2d 384, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 959, 89 S.Ct. 397, 21 L.Ed.2d 373 (1968); United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd., 1970 Trade Cases ¶ 73,000 (D.C.D. C.). The Glaxo case subsequently proceeded to judgment on the merits, but the issue…