ROSSO ET UX.

v.

PUERTO RICO

Citator

Cited By

• Brennan v. Schwerman Trucking Co. OF Va., Inc., 540 F.2d 1200 (4th Cir. 1976)
  …nevertheless mindful of the fact that it is not simply those carriers who actually obtain interstate business that are subject to the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Transportation. Starrett v. Bruce, 391 F. 2d 320, 323 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 971, 89 S.Ct. 404, 21 L.Ed.2d 384 (1968). The success or failure of Schwerman’s efforts to solicit interstate business is not the critical factor in determining whether the company is exempt from the provisions of the FLSA. Rather, the focus of inquiry…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Baird v. Wagoner Transp. Co., 425 F.2d 407 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …d under contention, of an interstate certificate gives the Interstate Commerce Commission jurisdiction over its drivers. See Goldberg v. Faber Industries, 291 F. 2d 232 (7th Cir. 1961); Starrett v. Bruce, 391 F. 2d 320 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 971, 89 S.Ct. 404, 21 L.Ed.2d 384. We find that the District Court properly concluded that the truck drivers were engaged in transportation which was wholly intrastate in character as defined by the MCA. We further find the District Court properly conc…
• Abelardo Baez v. Wells Fargo Armored Serv. Corp., 938 F.2d 180 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …Fargo is subject to the Secretary’s jurisdiction under the Motor Carrier Act. See 29 C.F.R. § 782.1(b); Brennan v. Schwerman Trucking Co. of Virginia, Inc., 540 F. 2d 1200 (4th Cir.1976); Starrett v. Bruce, 391 F. 2d 320 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 971, 89 S.Ct. 404, 21 L.Ed.2d 384 (1968). In fact, the permit issued by the ICC indicates that jurisdiction has already been exercised. See Brennan, 540 F. 2d at 1204. Thus, it is clear that Wells Fargo is a motor carrier subject to the Secretary’s j…