BOYLE, JUDGE, ET AL.

v.

LANDRY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Rodriquez v. United States, 395 U.S. 327 (U.S. 1969)
• Nat'l Mobilization Comm. TO END The WAR IN Viet NAM v. Foran, 411 F.2d 934 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …requirement of intent of course “narrows the scope of the enactment by exempting innocent or inadvertent conduct from its proscription.” Landry v. Daley, 280 F.Supp. 938, 939 (N.D.I11.1968) (three-judge district court), probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U.S. 974, 89 S.Ct. 442, 21 L.Ed.2d 436. In sum, we cannot say that the attack on Section 231(a) (1) involves a substantial constitutional question.6 The plaintiffs appear to have conceded the constitutionality of Section 231(a) (3), for it was not attacked…
• Honey v. Goodman, 432 F.2d 333 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …able Jurisdiction noted, 393 U.S. 1013, 89 S.Ct. 611, 21 L.Ed.2d 558 (1969) (No. 163, 1968 Term, renumbered No. 4, 1969 Term); and Landry v. Daley, 280 F.Supp. 938 (related cases include 288 F.Supp. 200) (N.D.Ill. 1968), Probable Jurisdiction noted, 393 U.S. 974, 89 S.Ct. 442, 21 L.Ed.2d 436 (1968) (No. 244, 1968 Term, renumbered No. 6, 1969 Term). The question as to whether 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is an “exception” to 28 U.S.C. § 2283 may well be decided in one or more of the above referred to cases. Although the…

  ← 1 / 2 →