BOYLE, JUDGE, ET AL.

v.

LANDRY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Rodriquez v. United States, 395 U.S. 327 (U.S. 1969)
• Nat'l Mobilization Comm. TO END The WAR IN Viet NAM v. Foran, 411 F.2d 934 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …requirement of intent of course “narrows the scope of the enactment by exempting innocent or inadvertent conduct from its proscription.” Landry v. Daley, 280 F.Supp. 938, 939 (N.D.I11.1968) (three-judge district court), probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U.S. 974, 89 S.Ct. 442, 21 L.Ed.2d 436. In sum, we cannot say that the attack on Section 231(a) (1) involves a substantial constitutional question.6 The plaintiffs appear to have conceded the constitutionality of Section 231(a) (3), for it was not attacked…
• Honey v. Goodman, 432 F.2d 333 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …v. Younger, 281 F.Supp. 507 (C.D.Cal. 1968), prob. juris, noted, 393 U.S. 1013, 89 S.Ct. 611, 21 L.Ed.2d 558 (1969) (No. 163, 1968 Term; renumbered No. 4, 1969 Term); Landry v. Daley, 288 F.Supp. 200 (N.D.Ill.), prob. juris, noted, Boyle v. Landry, 393 U.S. 974, 89 S.Ct. 442, 21 L.Ed.2d 436 (1968) (No. 244, 1968 Term; renumbered No. 6, 1969 Term). 38 U.S.L.W. 3429-3430, 3432, 3521 (U.S. 1970). The decisions of the Circuit Courts of Appeals are divided on the issue. Compare, Sheridan v. Garrison, 415 F. 2…

  ← 1 / 2 →