COSENTINO

v.

ROYAL NETHERLANDS STEAMSHIP CO.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Falls City Indus., Inc. v. Vanco Bev., Inc., 460 U.S. 428 (U.S. 1983)
  …s knowing them to be unlawful. The plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the prices met were actually illegal. Cadigan v. Texaco, Inc., 492 F. 2d 383, 387 (CA9 1974); National Dairy Products Corp. v. FTC, 395 F. 2d 517, 524 (CA7), cert. denied, 393 U. S. 977 (1968); see Standard Oil Co. v. Brown, 238 F. 2d 54, 58, and n. 7 (CA5 1956). Indeed, in some circumstances there may be no other plausible explanation for persistent “economic” price discrimination. Cf. FTC v. Cement Institute, 333 U. S. 683, 715…
• Sargent v. Genesco, Inc., 492 F.2d 750 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …thern District of New York.” Under 78aa venue is proper in any district where any act or transaction by any defendant in furtherance of an allegedly fraudulent scheme occurred. See Wyndham Associates v. Bintliff, 398 F. 2d 614 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 393 U.S. 977, 89 S.Ct. 444, 21 L.Ed.2d 438 (1968); Texas Gulf Sulphur v. Ritter, 371 F. 2d 145 (10th Cir. 1967); and Hooper v. Mountain States Securities Corp., supra. Given the propriety of New York venue, 1404(a) provides the only basis upon which this case co…
• Chemetron Corp. v. Bus. Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …. We find that that was not possible. As the Westec cases were filed in Houston or transferred from New York, nearly all of them were placed on Judge Hannay’s docket. See Wyndham Associates v. Bintliff, 398 F. 2d 614, 619-20 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 977, 89 S.Ct. 444, 21 L.Ed.2d 438 (1968). He entertained motions to consolidate for various purposes. Some cases were consolidated for all purposes, including trial, but Judge Hannay expressly consolidated Cosmos Bank and Chemetron “for purposes of pret…