REED

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Pelletier v. Zweifel, 921 F.2d 1465 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …wire fraud statutes. These statutes punish unexecuted, as well as executed, schemes. See Durland v. United States, 161 U.S. 306, 313-15, 16 S.Ct. 508, 511-12, 40 L.Ed. 709 (1896); Shale v. United States, 388 F. 2d 616, 618 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 984, 89 S.Ct. 456, 21 L.Ed.2d 445 (1968).72 This means that the government can convict a person for mail or wire fraud even if his targeted victim never encountered the deception — or, if he encountered it, was not deceived. Instead, the court uses a re…
• United States v. Peterson, 524 F.2d 167 (4th Cir. 1975)
  …ited States v. Calandra, supra, 414 U.S. at 348, 94 S.Ct. at 620. . See note 6, supra. . See Opper v. United States (1954) 348 U.S. 84, 94-5, 75 S.Ct. 158, 99 L.Ed. 101; United States v. Frazier (4th Cir. 1968) 394 F. 2d 258, 260-62, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 984, 89 S.Ct. 457, 21 L.Ed.2d 445 (1968); Oden v. United States (5th Cir. 1969) 410 F. 2d 103, 104, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 863, 90 S.Ct. 138, 24 L.Ed.2d 116 (1969); United States v. Kahn (2d Cir. 1966) 366 F. 2d 259, 263, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 948, 87…
• United States v. Severo D. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1985)
  …d allow co-defendants to employ a motion for severance to obtain benefits they would not have but for their joint indictment.’ ” United States v. Parodi, 703 F. 2d at 780 (citing United States v. Frazier, 394 F. 2d 258, 261 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 984, 89 S.Ct. 457, 21 L.Ed.2d 445 (1968), and United States v. Becker, 585 F. 2d 703, 706 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1080, 99 S.Ct. 862, 59 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979)). Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying severance o…