GRAY ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• United States v. Sampol, 636 F.2d 621 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …nciple similarly, requiring severance when the evidence against one or more of the defendants is “far more damaging” than evidence against the party seeking severance. Compare McHale v. United States, 398 F. 2d 757, 758 (D.C.Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985, 89 S.Ct. 462, 21 L.Ed.2d 447 (1968) with United States v. Bolden, 514 F. 2d 1301, 1310 (D.C.Cir.1975). Mardian pointed out that he had been indicted for only one of several counts that were alleged against his co-defendants, and that for that one c…
• United States v. Irie E. Leonard, 494 F.2d 955 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …wo co-defendants may conceivably require a severance under some circumstances,” but only if the evidence against one is “ ‘far more damaging.’ ” Gambrill, 449 F. 2d at 1159; McHale v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 163, 398 F. 2d 757, cert, denied, 393 U.S. 985, 89 S.Ct. 462, 21 L.Ed.2d 447 (1968). Although the evidence placing Leonard at the crime was both quantitatively and qualitatively greater than the evidence against Sarvis, the disparity does not meet the “far more damaging” test. The evidence agai…
• United States v. Lemonakis, 485 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …’s defense. DeLuna, supra, 308 F. 2d at 143. Finally, the disparity of evidence was not so damaging that an impermissible risk of transference of guilt to Enten was present. McHale v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 163, 398 F. 2d 757, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985, 89 S.Ct. 462, 21 L.Ed.2d 447 (1968). 18a . Appellant Enten alone, anti for the first time on appeal, complains of the fact that the tapes given to the jury at its request during its deliberations contained conversations in addition to those which…