BENTON
v.
MARYLAND
BENTON
MARYLAND
393 U.S. 994
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 (U.S. 1969)…tence of a concurrent sentence on the burglary count might prevent the Court from reaching the double jeopardy issue, at least if we found that any error affected only petitioner’s larceny conviction. Therefore, we scheduled the case for reargument, 393 U. S. 994 (1968), limited to the following additional question not included in the original writ: [*786] “(1) Is the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment? “(2) If so, was the petitioner ‘twic…
-
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 485 U.S. 617 (U.S. 1988)…U. S. 682 (1976) (decision), to address whether we should reconsider our holding in Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U. S. 398, 439 (1964), which had reaffirmed the Court’s adherence to the “act of state” doctrine. And in Benton v. Maryland, 393 U. S. 994 (1968) (ordering reargument), 395 U. S. 784 (1969) (decision), the Court requested reargument on the question whether the “concurrent sentence doctrine” had continuing validity. In addition, we have explicitly overruled statutory precedents in a ho…
-
United States v. Walton, 411 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1969)…splaced, even should we assume that the Supreme Court will not soon abandon it. See Benton v. Maryland, 1 Md.App. 647, 232 A. 2d 541 (Md. Ct.Spec.App.1967), cert. granted, 392 U.S. 925, 88 S.Ct. 2297, 20 L.Ed.2d 1384 (1967 Term), reargument ordered, 393 U.S. 994, 89 S.Ct. 481, 21 L.Ed.2d 460 (1968) (renumbered No. 201, 1968 Term).…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence