SHELDON

v.

IOWA

Citator

Cited By

• Sangaree v. Hamlin, 235 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 1970)
  …. Although the Federal judiciary has failed to implement the caveat expressed in Milton v. Cochran, supra, on the basis the McNabb-Mallory rule is not of constitutional dimensions [see Van Ermen v. Burke, 398 F. 2d 329 (7th Cir. 1968), Cert. denied 393 U.S. 1004, 89 S.Ct. 494, 21 L.Ed.2d 468], I fail to envision any sufficient reason why law enforcement authorities should continue to disregard our prior admonishments. Accordingly, I think the time has come to explore in certain terms whether the failure to…
• United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (U.S. 1976)
  …ferent.” Comment, 40 U. Chi. L. Rev., supra, n. 10, at 125. See, e. g., Stout v. Cupp, 426 F. 2d 881, 882-883 (CA9 1970) ; Peterson v. United States, 411 F. 2d 1074, 1079 (CA8 1969); Lessard v. Dickson, 394 F. 2d 88, 90-92 (CA9 1968), cert. denied, 393 U. S. 1004; United States v. Tomaiolo, 378 F. 2d 26, 28 (CA2 1967). One commentator has identified three different standards this way: “As discussed previously, in earlier cases the following standards for determining materiality for disclosure purposes were…
• United States v. Albanese, 554 F.2d 543 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …of sentence pending appeal. Many defendants elected this option, in some cases because they wished to avoid transfer to penitentiaries far from their homes. See, e. g. Bandy v. United States, 396 F. 2d 929, 930 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1004, 89 S.Ct. 494, 21 L.Ed.2d 469 (1968); United States v. Lawrenson, 383 F. 2d 77, 79-80 (4th Cir. 1967) (per curiam). There is no information in the record here as to whether appellant made such an election in 1961.…