BRYANT ET UX.

v.

ILLINOIS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Levine v. Seilon, Inc., 439 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …icus that Sterling Precision’s refusal to read “purchase” as encompassing a redemption depends upon considerations peculiar to the Investment Company Act, see S. E. C. v. Talley Industries, Inc., 399 F. 2d 396, 403 n. 6 (2 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1015, 89 S.Ct. 615, 21 L.Ed.2d 560 (1969), we would agree that if a company, by making an exchange offer it has no intention to perform, fraudulently induces holders of redeemable preferred stock to give consents necessary to raise the money required for…
• Cannon v. Consol. Freightways Corp. & Teamsters Local 710, 524 F.2d 290 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …here it is arbitrary or capricious (Mogge v. District 8, International Ass’n of Machinists, 454 F. 2d 510, 513 (7th Cir. 1971); Yellow Cab Co. v. Democratic Union Organizing Committee Local 777, 398 F. 2d 735, 737 (7th Cir. 1968), certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1015, 89 S.Ct. 619, 21 L.Ed.2d 561), or where the process is tainted by fraud or deceit. Margetta v. Pam Pam Corp., 501 F. 2d 179, 180 (9th Cir. 1974); Bieski v. Eastern Automobile Forwarding Co., 396 F. 2d 32, 37 (3d Cir. 1968). None of these circumsta…
• NF&M Corp. v. United Steelworkers OF Am., 524 F.2d 756 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …vance procedure in a labor contract excused by the parties’ practical construction of it or “in light of the practice of the shop.” Yellow Cab Co. v. Democratic Union Organizing Committee, Local 777, 398 F. 2d 735, 737 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1015, 89 S.Ct. 619, 21 L.Ed.2d 561 (1969). In this instance, the arbitrator did not make an explicit finding that compliance with the grievance procedures was excused. Rather, his opinion states that the time bar can be reasonably construed to be inappl…