MENDEZ

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Pressley v. State, 469 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
  …fter the warnings were given. See United States ex rel. Henne v. Fike, 563 F. 2d 809 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1072, 98 S.Ct. 1257, 55 L.Ed.2d 776 (1978) (nine hours); Miller v. United States, 396 F. 2d 492 (8th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1031, 89 S.Ct. 643, 21 L.Ed.2d 574 (1969) (a thirty minute break); People v. Schenk, 24 Cal.App.3d 233, 101 Cal.Rptr. 75, (1972) (thirty minutes); Hall v. State, 440 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (one hour twenty minutes); State v. Williams, 386 So. 2d…
• United States v. Maze, 414 U.S. 395 (U.S. 1974)
  …es where the use of the mails is a means of concealment so that further frauds [*415] which are part of the scheme may be perpetrated.” Kann v. United States, supra, at 94—95. See United States v. Hendrickson, 394 F. 2d 807 (CA6 1968), cert. denied, 393 U. S. 1031 (1969); United States v. Riedel, 126 F. 2d 81, 83 (CA7 1942); United States v. Lowe, 115 F. 2d 596, 599 (CA7), cert. denied, 311 U. S. 717 (1940). Moreover, it fails to take appropriate account of our most recent decision construing § 1341. In Unite…
• United States v. Delay, 500 F.2d 1360 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …t. at 1629. A confession is not necessarily' invalid because the Miranda warning is not repeated in full each time the interrogation process is resumed after an interruption. Miller v. United States, 396 F. 2d 492, 496 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1031, 89 S.Ct. 643, 21 L.Ed.2d 574 (1969). In each case, the ultimate question is: did the defendant with a full knowledge of his legal rights, knowingly and intentionally relinquish them ? After a review of the record, we believe that there was sufficie…