TINCH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Reed, 572 F.2d 412 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …nied, 402 U.S. 989, 91 S.Ct. 1675, 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971); United States v. Lozaw, 427 F. 2d 911, 914-15 (2d Cir. 1970); id. at 917- (Lumbard, C. J., and Hays, J., concurring); United States v. Llanes, 398 F. 2d 880, 883 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1032, 89 S.Ct. 647, 21 L.Ed.2d 576 (1969); United States v. McMillan, 368 F. 2d 810 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 909, 87 S.Ct. 856, 17 L.Ed.2d 783 (1967); United States v. Conti, 361 F. 2d 153 (2d Cir. 1966), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S.…
• United States v. Calixto Agapito, 620 F.2d 324 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …ndant’s expectation of privacy was not reasonable. We have applied the reasonable expectation of privacy principles of Katz to non-electronic eavesdropping on several occasions. In United States v. Llanes, 398 F. 2d 880 (2 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1032 (1969), we upheld the eavesdropping by an agent who was positioned outside the defendant’s apartment door. Accord, United States v. Wilkes, 451 F. 2d 938, 941 n. 6 (2 Cir. 1971). In Llanes we reasoned that an individual who speaks in a tone audible…
• United States v. Ortega, 471 F.2d 1350 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …of this agent in the next room? It is conceded that no electronic surveillance was in any way involved. What can be heard by the naked ear is not protected by the Fourth Amendment, United States v. Llanes, 398 F. 2d 880 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1032, 89 S.Ct. 647, 21 L.Ed.2d 576 (1969). The Supreme Court had already noted that “The risk of being overheard by an eavesdropper * * * is probably inherent in the conditions of human society. It is the kind of risk we necessarily assume whenever we…