NATHANIEL WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES BRAY, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1966-12-21
No. 364
ANDREWS, Acting C. J., WALDEN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.
193 So. 2d 230 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Nathaniel Williams, appeals an order granting plaintiff, James Bray, a new trial. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and find that the court did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Collins Fruit Company v. Giglio, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 447. As the granting of a new trial was proper there is no ' need to discuss the remaining points raised on appeal.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, Acting C. J., WALDEN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. Bray, 201 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 1967)
    …Certiorari denied without opinion. 193 So. 2d 230.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw